Fordham Law School updated December 3, 2013
Torts - Fall 2013
Section 9
Tuesday 6:00 - 8:50
Thursday 6:00 - 7:50
Room 211
George W. Conk
Adjunct Professor of Law
Senior Fellow, Stein Center for Law & Ethics
Rm 409
212-636-7446
gconk@law.fordham.edu
Class schedule:
Tuesday & Thursday evenings
Required Casebook:
Franklin, Rabin & Green, Tort Law & Alternatives, 9th Edition, Foundation Press, 2011
isbn 978-1-59941-860-5
Suggested reading:
Shapo & Shapo, Law School Without Fear: strategies for success, 2d edition Foundation Press
Mark A. Geistfeld, Tort Law: The Essentials, Aspen/Wolters Kluwer
Course website: TWEN
Course blog: Torts Today
Required Readings
Prologue
The Constitution of the United States of America
Prof. Karl Llewellyn - Elements of the Law (1957) audio
Week 1 (estimated times of arrival - actual times may vary)
First class: organizational meeting/opening lecture
Chapter 1 - Introduction to Tort Liability
Fault-based, vicarious, and strict liability
Casebook - pages 2 - 29
(Hammontree v. Jenner, Christensen v. Swensen, Roessler v. Novak)
Suggested reading: ALI, Restatement 3rd, Tort: Independent Contractors - blackletter Apparent Agency - NJ Model Civil Jury Charge 5.50A
Slideshow: End of the Silver Maple - Torts Today
Background: the Hammontree file (optional)
Chapter 2 - The Negligence Principle
Historical Development of fault liability
Casebook pp. 30 - 60
(Brown v. Kendall)
The Central Concept - The Standard of Care
(U.S. v. Carroll Towing, 159 F.2d 169 (2d Cir. 1947); Adams v. Bullock)
Optional: The Adams v. Bullock story
Week 2
The Reasonable Person
Ordinary care or “ the utmost care, so far as human skill and foresight can go".
(Bethel v. NYCTA)
Bolton v. Stone [1951] A C 850 - Speech of Lord Reid (TWEN - Course Materials)
The Roles of Judge and Jury, Custom, Statutes, Regulations
Who decides? Based on what?
Is ordinary care what is ordinarily done?
Casebook 60 - 67
(B&O RR Co. v. Goodman, Pokora v. Wabash Rwy. Co., Andrews v. United Airlines)
The Role of Custom and Statutes
Casebook 68 - 85
Morris v. West Hartlepool Steam Navigation Co., Ltd.
1 All ER 385, [1956] (TWEN) Nautical Glossary
The T.J. Hooper v. Northern Barge, 60 F.2d 737 (2d Cir. 1932)
OSHA fall protection standards (courtesy of Robson Forensic)
(Trimarco v. Klein, Martin v. Herzog, Tedla v. Elman)
Statutory interpretation: the implied cause of action
Title IX and gender equality in student athletics - Linda Greenhouse
Week 3
Proof of Negligence
Casebook pp. 85 - 128
(Negri v. Stop & Shop; Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History; Byrne v. Boadle; McDougald v. Perry; Ybarra v. Spangard)
Res Ipsa Loquitur - Sec. 328D 2d Restatement of Torts
Medical Malpractice - the standard of care for professionals
Proving the standard of care
Sheeley v. Memorial Hospital
Background (optional): American Board of Medical Specialties Contrast: Competence of Experts, Affidavits of Merit - NJSA 2A:53A-41
Res ipsa
Sides v. St. Anthony’s Medical Center
Informed Consent
Matthies v. Mastromonaco
N.Y. Public Health Law § 2805-d. Limitation of medical, dental or podiatric malpractice action based on lack of informed consent
N.J. Model Civil Jury Charge - Medical Negligence
Week 4
Chapter 3 - The Duty Requirement: Physical Injuries
Introduction, Duty, No Duty, and Affirmative obligations to act
Rescue and exceptions to the no duty to rescue rule
Casebook 129 - 188
Affirmative Duties, (black letter) Restatement of Torts, 3rd, §§ 7, 37, 40 (TWEN)
(Harper v. Herman ; Farwell v. Keaton, Moch v. Renssalaer (link is to full text. Excerpted in the casebook @p. 175)
Misrepresentation
(Randi W. v. Maroc Jt. Unified School District)
Duty owed to a third party
(Tarasoff v. Board of Regents)
Did James Holmes's psychiatrist discharge her duty? (link is to Torts Today)
Policy reasons for invoking no duty of care
(Strauss v. Belle Realty, Reynolds v. Hicks, Vince v. Wilson)
In Re NYC Asbestos Litigation -Holdampf v. Port Authority, 840 N.E. 2d 115 (NY 2005) (TWEN)
Olivo v. Owens Illinois, 895 A. 2d 1143 (NJ 2006) (TWEN)
Georgia Pacific v. Farrar, Md. Ct. of Appeals (2013)
Worth a look: student Note - Yelena Kotlarsky, The "Peripheral Plaintiff": Duty Determinations in `Take-Home' Asbestos Cases, - Fordham L. Rev. (2012)
Statutory limitations of duty: the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Firearms Act of 2005. See this blog post for the text of the statute and Prof. John Culhane's Slate article.
Week 5
Casebook 188 - 217
Duties of Landowners and Occupiers
3rd Restatement §§ 49 - 54 Duty of Land Possessors (black letter) (also on TWEN - as is the complete draft)
(Carter v. Kinney, Heins v. Webster County, Posecai v. Walmart, A.W. v. Lancaster)
Aurora, CO `Dark Knight massacre' - Traynom v. Cinemark civil complaints (read only one) Magistrate's Report on motion to dismiss
Duty: Governmental Entities
Casebook 227 - 259
The Federal Tort Claims Act - Statutory excerpts (TWEN)
(Riss v. City of New York; Lauer v. City of New York, Friedman v. State of New York, Cope v.Scott)
Suggested: Crazy Love (film trailer)
Millbrook v. U.S. , 133 S. Ct. 1441 (2013)
- argument recap
Optional:
The Brandeis Brief - Muller v. Oregon, 208 US 412 (1907)
In Matter of World Trade Center Bombing
Week 6
Chapter 4 - The Duty Requirement: Nonphysical Harm
Emotional Harm
Casebook 260 - 298
(Falzone v. Busch, Metro North v. Buckley; Gammon v. Osteopathic Hospital; Portee v. Jaffe, Johnson v. Jamaica Hospital)
Optional: McDougall v. Lamm (NJ 2012)
Chapter 8, 3rd Restatement, §§ 1, 2, 3, 45, 46, 47, 48 -Liability for Emotional Disturbance (TWEN)
Economic Harm
Casebook 298-319
(NYCAL v. KPMG Peat Marwick, LLP; 532 Madison Gourmet foods, Inc. v. Finlandia Center)
Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (excerpts)
BP Deepwater Horizon settlement (introduction - slides)
Business Economic Loss Framework exhibit 4C
Deepwater Horizon Settlement Fund (homepage)
Week 7
Chapter 5 Causation
Cause in Fact (But-for causation, admissibility, and sufficiency of evidence)
Casebook 333-364
Admissibility of expert opinion testimony: Fed. R. Evid. 702
(Stubbs v. City of Rochester; Zuchowicz v. U.S; Matsuyama v. Birnbaum)
NJ Model Civil Jury Charge 5.50E - Pre-existing Condition - Increased risk/loss of chance Proximate Cause
McDarby v. Merck, 401 NJ Super 10 (NJ App. Div. 2008) (excerpted) Slideshow - the Vioxx story
Multiple defendants & Joint & Several Liability
Casebook 364 - 393
(Summers v. Tice; Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co.)
Uniform Apportionment of Tort Responsibility Act (2003 ed.) - Uniform Laws Commission
Week 8
Ch. 5 - Causation
Proximate Cause and the Scope of Liability
Scope of Liability: Unexpected harm
Casebook 393-432
(Benn v. Thomas; Polemis; The Wagon Mound)
Texting to a driver - Kubert v. Best (N.J.A.D. 2013)
Superseding causes
(Doe v. Mannheimer; Hinojo v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company, 353 N.J. Super 261 (App. Div. 2002)
Suggested reading: Restatement 2d - Superseding Cause - §§ 440 - 452 (TWEN)
Unexpected victim
Palsgraf v. LIRR; The Kinsman Cases - 2d Circuit - I (1964) and II (1968)
Suggested reading: Restatement (3rd) of Torts § 29 (TWEN)
Week 9
Chapter 7 Strict Liability
Casebook 507-520
Fletcher v. Rylands, Rylands v. Fletcher
Sullivan v. Dunham
New York Labor Law 240, 241
Savillo v. Greenpoint Landing
Chapter 8 Liability for Defective Products
Casebook 551-571
Restatement 2d, Section 402 A (TWEN)
Introduction and Manufacturing Defects
(MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.; Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.)
Weeks 10 - 11
Chapter 8 Liability for defective products - continued
Design, and information defects; defenses; work-related injuries
SawStop: table saw safety technology. View videos
READ 1st Circuit decision upholding plaintiff's verdict Osorio v. One World Technology
Read posts on Torts Today HERE and HERE
Background reading: casebook 571-599
Design Defects
(Soule v. GM, Camacho v. Honda)
Hinojo v. NJM, 353 N.J. Super 261 (App. Div. 2002) (TWEN)
Halliday v. Sturm & Ruger, 368 Md. 186 (2002) (consumer expectations) (TWEN)
Background: Children and Guns - the Hidden toll - NY Times.
TPM: U.S. Hospitals Admit 7,500 kids/year for gunshots
Should Bushmaster be liable for the murders in Newtown, CT, shootings carried out with its AR 15 assault rifle? Should guns be regulated by product liability law? by the Consumer Product Safety Commission? Should careless gun owners be prosecuted?
Warnings
Casebook 599-646
(Hood v. Ryobi (see video); State v. Karl; Vassallo v. Baxter)
Defenses & Work Related Injuries
(GM v. Sanchez, Jones v. Ryobi, Liriano v. Hobart)
Crippen v. N.J. Central Concrete, 176 N.J. 397 (2003) (TWEN)
Week 12
Chapter 6 Defenses
Casebook 433-489
Plaintiff’s fault
Contributory negligence, comparative fault, avoidable consequences, assumption of risk
Comparative Fault Act Summary - Final Act Uniform Laws Commission
(Fritts v. McKinne; Dalury v. SKI; Hanks v. Powder Ridge; Murphy v. Steeplechase; Davenport v. Cotton; Levandoski v. Cone)
Week 13
Chapter 9 Trespass & Nuisance
Nuisance - elements of liability - Restatement 2d - Torts - black letter
Casebook 674-709
(Martin v. Reynolds; Boomer v. Atlantic Cement; State of Rhode Island v. Lead Industries)
Ch. 10 Damages and Insurance
Casebook 710-750
Compensatory Damages
(Seffert v. Los Angeles Transit; McDougald v. Garber; Arambula v. Wells)
NJ Model Jury Charge - Damages - Chapter 8
Personal injury and wrongful death
Sample economic report - wrongful death (Daniel Jones) (TWEN)
Background: Joint & Several Liability - 50 State Survey - Wilson Elser
Unlikely to be reached
Punitive Damages
Casebook 750-776
(Taylor v. Superior Court; State Farm v. Campbell)
Chapter 12 Intentional Harm
The Federal Civil Rights Action and Liability of Federal Officials
Casebook 968-984
(Wilson v. Layne)
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, U.S. Supreme Court (2009)
Torts - Fall 2013
Section 9
Tuesday 6:00 - 8:50
Thursday 6:00 - 7:50
Room 211
George W. Conk
Adjunct Professor of Law
Senior Fellow, Stein Center for Law & Ethics
Rm 409
212-636-7446
gconk@law.fordham.edu
Class schedule:
Tuesday & Thursday evenings
Required Casebook:
Franklin, Rabin & Green, Tort Law & Alternatives, 9th Edition, Foundation Press, 2011
isbn 978-1-59941-860-5
Suggested reading:
Shapo & Shapo, Law School Without Fear: strategies for success, 2d edition Foundation Press
Mark A. Geistfeld, Tort Law: The Essentials, Aspen/Wolters Kluwer
Course website: TWEN
Course blog: Torts Today
Required Readings
Prologue
The Constitution of the United States of America
Prof. Karl Llewellyn - Elements of the Law (1957) audio
Week 1 (estimated times of arrival - actual times may vary)
First class: organizational meeting/opening lecture
Chapter 1 - Introduction to Tort Liability
Fault-based, vicarious, and strict liability
Casebook - pages 2 - 29
(Hammontree v. Jenner, Christensen v. Swensen, Roessler v. Novak)
Suggested reading: ALI, Restatement 3rd, Tort: Independent Contractors - blackletter Apparent Agency - NJ Model Civil Jury Charge 5.50A
Slideshow: End of the Silver Maple - Torts Today
Background: the Hammontree file (optional)
Chapter 2 - The Negligence Principle
Historical Development of fault liability
Casebook pp. 30 - 60
(Brown v. Kendall)
The Central Concept - The Standard of Care
(U.S. v. Carroll Towing, 159 F.2d 169 (2d Cir. 1947); Adams v. Bullock)
Optional: The Adams v. Bullock story
Week 2
The Reasonable Person
Ordinary care or “ the utmost care, so far as human skill and foresight can go".
(Bethel v. NYCTA)
Bolton v. Stone [1951] A C 850 - Speech of Lord Reid (TWEN - Course Materials)
The Roles of Judge and Jury, Custom, Statutes, Regulations
Who decides? Based on what?
Is ordinary care what is ordinarily done?
Casebook 60 - 67
(B&O RR Co. v. Goodman, Pokora v. Wabash Rwy. Co., Andrews v. United Airlines)
The Role of Custom and Statutes
Casebook 68 - 85
1 All ER 385, [1956] (TWEN) Nautical Glossary
The T.J. Hooper v. Northern Barge, 60 F.2d 737 (2d Cir. 1932)
OSHA fall protection standards (courtesy of Robson Forensic)
(Trimarco v. Klein, Martin v. Herzog, Tedla v. Elman)
Statutory interpretation: the implied cause of action
Title IX and gender equality in student athletics - Linda Greenhouse
Week 3
Proof of Negligence
Casebook pp. 85 - 128
(Negri v. Stop & Shop; Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History; Byrne v. Boadle; McDougald v. Perry; Ybarra v. Spangard)
Res Ipsa Loquitur - Sec. 328D 2d Restatement of Torts
Medical Malpractice - the standard of care for professionals
Proving the standard of care
Sheeley v. Memorial Hospital
Background (optional): American Board of Medical Specialties Contrast: Competence of Experts, Affidavits of Merit - NJSA 2A:53A-41
Res ipsa
Sides v. St. Anthony’s Medical Center
Informed Consent
Matthies v. Mastromonaco
N.Y. Public Health Law § 2805-d. Limitation of medical, dental or podiatric malpractice action based on lack of informed consent
N.J. Model Civil Jury Charge - Medical Negligence
5.50 | Apparent Authority Charge | .doc | |
5.50A | Duty and Negligence | .doc | |
5.50B | Common Knowledge Standard of Care | .doc | |
5.50C | Informed Consent (Competent Adult and No Emergency) | .doc | |
5.50D | Intentionally Left Blank | ||
5.50E | Pre-Existing Condition — Increased Risk/Loss of Chance — Proximate Cause | .doc | |
5.50F | Wrongful Birth and Life | .doc | |
5.50G | Medical Judgment | .doc | |
5.50H | Alteration Of Medical Records | .doc | |
5.50I | Fraudulent Concealment Of Medical Records | .doc |
Week 4
Chapter 3 - The Duty Requirement: Physical Injuries
Introduction, Duty, No Duty, and Affirmative obligations to act
Rescue and exceptions to the no duty to rescue rule
Casebook 129 - 188
Affirmative Duties, (black letter) Restatement of Torts, 3rd, §§ 7, 37, 40 (TWEN)
(Harper v. Herman ; Farwell v. Keaton, Moch v. Renssalaer (link is to full text. Excerpted in the casebook @p. 175)
Misrepresentation
(Randi W. v. Maroc Jt. Unified School District)
Duty owed to a third party
(Tarasoff v. Board of Regents)
Did James Holmes's psychiatrist discharge her duty? (link is to Torts Today)
Policy reasons for invoking no duty of care
(Strauss v. Belle Realty, Reynolds v. Hicks, Vince v. Wilson)
In Re NYC Asbestos Litigation -Holdampf v. Port Authority, 840 N.E. 2d 115 (NY 2005) (TWEN)
Olivo v. Owens Illinois, 895 A. 2d 1143 (NJ 2006) (TWEN)
Georgia Pacific v. Farrar, Md. Ct. of Appeals (2013)
Worth a look: student Note - Yelena Kotlarsky, The "Peripheral Plaintiff": Duty Determinations in `Take-Home' Asbestos Cases, - Fordham L. Rev. (2012)
Statutory limitations of duty: the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Firearms Act of 2005. See this blog post for the text of the statute and Prof. John Culhane's Slate article.
Week 5
Casebook 188 - 217
Duties of Landowners and Occupiers
3rd Restatement §§ 49 - 54 Duty of Land Possessors (black letter) (also on TWEN - as is the complete draft)
(Carter v. Kinney, Heins v. Webster County, Posecai v. Walmart, A.W. v. Lancaster)
Aurora, CO `Dark Knight massacre' - Traynom v. Cinemark civil complaints (read only one) Magistrate's Report on motion to dismiss
Duty: Governmental Entities
Casebook 227 - 259
The Federal Tort Claims Act - Statutory excerpts (TWEN)
(Riss v. City of New York; Lauer v. City of New York, Friedman v. State of New York, Cope v.Scott)
Suggested: Crazy Love (film trailer)
Millbrook v. U.S. , 133 S. Ct. 1441 (2013)
- argument recap
Optional:
The Brandeis Brief - Muller v. Oregon, 208 US 412 (1907)
In Matter of World Trade Center Bombing
Week 6
Chapter 4 - The Duty Requirement: Nonphysical Harm
Emotional Harm
Casebook 260 - 298
(Falzone v. Busch, Metro North v. Buckley; Gammon v. Osteopathic Hospital; Portee v. Jaffe, Johnson v. Jamaica Hospital)
Optional: McDougall v. Lamm (NJ 2012)
Chapter 8, 3rd Restatement, §§ 1, 2, 3, 45, 46, 47, 48 -Liability for Emotional Disturbance (TWEN)
Economic Harm
Casebook 298-319
(NYCAL v. KPMG Peat Marwick, LLP; 532 Madison Gourmet foods, Inc. v. Finlandia Center)
Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (excerpts)
BP Deepwater Horizon settlement (introduction - slides)
Business Economic Loss Framework exhibit 4C
Deepwater Horizon Settlement Fund (homepage)
Week 7
Chapter 5 Causation
Cause in Fact (But-for causation, admissibility, and sufficiency of evidence)
Casebook 333-364
Admissibility of expert opinion testimony: Fed. R. Evid. 702
(Stubbs v. City of Rochester; Zuchowicz v. U.S; Matsuyama v. Birnbaum)
NJ Model Civil Jury Charge 5.50E - Pre-existing Condition - Increased risk/loss of chance Proximate Cause
McDarby v. Merck, 401 NJ Super 10 (NJ App. Div. 2008) (excerpted) Slideshow - the Vioxx story
Multiple defendants & Joint & Several Liability
Casebook 364 - 393
(Summers v. Tice; Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co.)
Uniform Apportionment of Tort Responsibility Act (2003 ed.) - Uniform Laws Commission
Week 8
Ch. 5 - Causation
Proximate Cause and the Scope of Liability
Scope of Liability: Unexpected harm
Casebook 393-432
(Benn v. Thomas; Polemis; The Wagon Mound)
Texting to a driver - Kubert v. Best (N.J.A.D. 2013)
New Jersey Model Civil Jury ChargesCHAPTER SIX - PROXIMATE CAUSE | |||
6.10 | Proximate Cause — General Charge To Be Given In All Cases | ||
6.11 | Proximate Cause — Routine Tort Where No Issues Of Concurrent Or Intervening Causes, Or Foreseeability Of Injury Or Harm | ||
6.12 | Proximate Cause — Claim That Concurrent Causes of Harm Were Present | ||
6.13 | Proximate Cause — Claim That Concurrent Causes of Harm Are Present And Claim That Specific Harm Was Not Foreseeable | ||
6.14 | Proximate Cause — Claim of Intervening or Superseding Cause |
Superseding causes
(Doe v. Mannheimer; Hinojo v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company, 353 N.J. Super 261 (App. Div. 2002)
Suggested reading: Restatement 2d - Superseding Cause - §§ 440 - 452 (TWEN)
Unexpected victim
Palsgraf v. LIRR; The Kinsman Cases - 2d Circuit - I (1964) and II (1968)
Suggested reading: Restatement (3rd) of Torts § 29 (TWEN)
Week 9
Chapter 7 Strict Liability
Casebook 507-520
Fletcher v. Rylands, Rylands v. Fletcher
Sullivan v. Dunham
New York Labor Law 240, 241
Savillo v. Greenpoint Landing
Chapter 8 Liability for Defective Products
Casebook 551-571
Restatement 2d, Section 402 A (TWEN)
Introduction and Manufacturing Defects
(MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.; Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.)
Weeks 10 - 11
Chapter 8 Liability for defective products - continued
Design, and information defects; defenses; work-related injuries
SawStop: table saw safety technology. View videos
READ 1st Circuit decision upholding plaintiff's verdict Osorio v. One World Technology
Read posts on Torts Today HERE and HERE
Background reading: casebook 571-599
Design Defects
(Soule v. GM, Camacho v. Honda)
Hinojo v. NJM, 353 N.J. Super 261 (App. Div. 2002) (TWEN)
Halliday v. Sturm & Ruger, 368 Md. 186 (2002) (consumer expectations) (TWEN)
Background: Children and Guns - the Hidden toll - NY Times.
TPM: U.S. Hospitals Admit 7,500 kids/year for gunshots
Should Bushmaster be liable for the murders in Newtown, CT, shootings carried out with its AR 15 assault rifle? Should guns be regulated by product liability law? by the Consumer Product Safety Commission? Should careless gun owners be prosecuted?
Warnings
Casebook 599-646
(Hood v. Ryobi (see video); State v. Karl; Vassallo v. Baxter)
Defenses & Work Related Injuries
(GM v. Sanchez, Jones v. Ryobi, Liriano v. Hobart)
Crippen v. N.J. Central Concrete, 176 N.J. 397 (2003) (TWEN)
Week 12
Chapter 6 Defenses
Casebook 433-489
Plaintiff’s fault
Contributory negligence, comparative fault, avoidable consequences, assumption of risk
Comparative Fault Act Summary - Final Act Uniform Laws Commission
(Fritts v. McKinne; Dalury v. SKI; Hanks v. Powder Ridge; Murphy v. Steeplechase; Davenport v. Cotton; Levandoski v. Cone)
Week 13
Chapter 9 Trespass & Nuisance
Nuisance - elements of liability - Restatement 2d - Torts - black letter
Casebook 674-709
(Martin v. Reynolds; Boomer v. Atlantic Cement; State of Rhode Island v. Lead Industries)
Ch. 10 Damages and Insurance
Casebook 710-750
Compensatory Damages
(Seffert v. Los Angeles Transit; McDougald v. Garber; Arambula v. Wells)
NJ Model Jury Charge - Damages - Chapter 8
Personal injury and wrongful death
Sample economic report - wrongful death (Daniel Jones) (TWEN)
Background: Joint & Several Liability - 50 State Survey - Wilson Elser
Unlikely to be reached
Punitive Damages
Casebook 750-776
(Taylor v. Superior Court; State Farm v. Campbell)
Chapter 12 Intentional Harm
The Federal Civil Rights Action and Liability of Federal Officials
Casebook 968-984
(Wilson v. Layne)
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, U.S. Supreme Court (2009)