Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Reporter as Amicus Applies Restatement 3rd Duty Analysis to PCB Exposure Case


In Nishida v. Pharmacia Third Restatement of Torts Reporter Michael Green joins with his colleague Jon Cardi and several other torts professors as friends of the court  to persuade the Missouri Court of Appeals that a trial court misunderstood the Restatement and the applicable California law.   The trial judge concluded that the chemical company did not owe a duty of reasonable care to one exposed to its PCB's because the product uses and  type of harm plaintiff suffered (non-Hodgkins lymphoma) were not foreseeable to the manufacturer Monsanto (now known as Pharmacia).  Such particular determinations violate the essential thrust of the Restatement - and California law.

Green and Cardi, et al.  assert, in the amicus brief drafted by Texas appellate lawyer Brent Rosenthal that
The essential characteristic of a no-duty determination is that it applies to a specific category of factual scenarios and can be applied in similar cases without reference to the particular facts of those cases.  
Viewing the question of duty as a categorical determination rather than as a fact specific inquiry “also has the benefit of providing clearer rules of behavior for actors who may be subject to tort liability and who structure their behavior in response to that potential liability.”
The trial court held that persons exposed to PCB's in the waste disposal process were "bystanders", not persons whose exposure was "foreseeable or intentional".  Such a fact-sensitive determination intrudes on the jury's province - which is to determine the question of foreseaebility.  Instead the court preempted the jury's role of determining whether Monsanto - maker of over 99% of PCB containing products - should have foreseen and acted to protect those who would be exposed to the toxin at all points in the product life cycle - including disposal.

Students in my class who read the brief will note that two of the cases cited provided the facts for final exam questions. - gwc
h/t Torts Prof Blog
'via Blog this'

3 comments:

  1. The United States renews its calls for people of conscience and governments around the world to reach out to Iranian authorities and demand Pastor Nadarkhani's immediate release. what essay writing site should i use

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have read this blog and this is a nice one:

    The Pcb testing piece above has been all carefully evade and understood that is mean to study how all Pcb test works are originated and then those are regulated form all professional point of view as it can be safe for kids and PCB lawyer students who are studying in any school or college as they can avoid all toxic substances and items that are always found Pcb removal and time.

    ReplyDelete
  3. be protective with the best health service of pcb contact us :- The Pcb schools San Diego for comprehensive things in addition to requirements. In the region of crops in addition to goods in addition to belongings may requirement go on final PCB soil contamination everyplace few had better too been final boorish for its looming Pcb schools on the imposes. The thorough PCB contamination individual it has hang onto on mull over in the directly above your crown your pate subdivision on winnings PCB Lawyer California.

    ReplyDelete