Mourning Victims and Assigning Blame After Fatal Boat Crash on the Hudson - NYTimes.com

Mourning Victims and Assigning Blame After Fatal Boat Crash on the Hudson - NYTimes.com: by Cara Buckley

PIERMONT, N.Y. — It was a gorgeous midsummer night on the banks of the Hudson, the first Friday since the recent heat wave broke, and business at Pier 701, this riverfront village’s newest restaurant, was brisk. Diners and revelers chatted happily on the new sprawling wooden deck, and across the darkened river the lights of Tarrytown twinkled.

Boat Crash on Hudson Kills Bride-to-Be - NYTimes.com

Boat Crash on Hudson Kills Bride-to-Be - NYTimes.com: "A young woman who was set to be married in two weeks was killed and her fiancé’s best man remained missing on Saturday after a boating accident on the Hudson River on Friday night, the authorities said."



'via Blog this'

BP Wants To Stop Paying Damages For Gulf Spill While Lawyer Is Investigated For Misconduct

This investigation involves a single staff attorney who apparently was a plaintiff's lawyer who had a stake in some cases.  BP is having success with the business press, roping in people like the intermittently reasonable Joe Nocera, and is now moving to create more extravagant headlines to influenc the conservative Fifth Circuit, I suppose.  - GWC
BP Wants To Stop Paying Damages For Gulf Spill While Lawyer Is Investigated For Misconduct:

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — BP asked a federal judge on Tuesday to temporarily halt all settlement payments to Gulf Coast businesses and residents who claim they lost money after the company’s 2010 oil spill while former FBI Director Louis Freeh investigates alleged misconduct by a lawyer who helped administer the multibillion-dollar settlement program.

BP PLC argues in a court filing that it shouldn’t be required to take the risk that hundreds of millions of dollars in claims payments could be “tainted by fraud, corruption and malfeasance.”

“A temporary suspension in … payments will eliminate the serious risk of any further irreparable harm to BP while having little negative impact upon the claimants,” attorneys for the London-based oil giant wrote.

U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier didn’t immediately rule on BP’s most recent request to temporarily halt settlement payouts.

In April, Barbier refused to block what could be billions of dollars of payments to businesses after BP argued that he and court-supervised claims administrator Patrick Juneau have misinterpreted the settlement and forced the company to pay for inflated and fictitious losses.

Barbier, who appointed Juneau, upheld his interpretation of settlement terms governing payments to businesses. BP appealed that decision.

A three-judge panel from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard the case last Monday. The panel didn’t indicate how soon it would rule.

'via Blog this'

Madoff Case Puts Focus on Duties of Custodial Banks - NYTimes.com

Madoff Case Puts Focus on Duties of Custodial Banks - NYTimes.com:
by Susan Antilla

Among the far-flung feeder funds, brokerage houses and institutions interconnected in the vast Ponzi scheme perpetuated by Bernard L. Madoff, one little-known local bank is now in the spotlight.

Westport National Bank and its parent company, Connecticut Community Bank, is the type of Main Street bank found in Anytown U.S.A., rather than near Wall Street. It has one main office and nine affiliated branches, all within a small radius stretching from Fairfield to Greenwich.

But to more than 200 individual investors, it was the bank that should have stood sentry over their money. A lawsuit brought by investors who lost a combined $60 million in the Madoff Ponzi scheme seeks to show that the bank failed at its job as the custodial bank in charge of their money.

Though it was one of many institutions entangled with Mr. Madoff and his firm, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, the trial serves as a cautionary tale for any investor on the role and duties of custodial banks. The central question at the heart of the civil case is what obligation, if any, such banks have in determining whether the assets of investors exist at all.

A jury in Hartford finished hearing eight days of evidence last month in the case before Judge Vanessa L. Bryant of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. Closing arguments are expected to be heard on Thursday.
'via Blog this'

Judge Orders N.F.L. Concussion Case to Mediation - NYTimes.com

Judge Orders N.F.L. Concussion Case to Mediation - NYTimes.com: 
"The federal judge overseeing the case brought by thousands of former N.F.L. players who have accused the league of hiding the dangers of concussions ordered both sides to mediation Monday.
United States District Court Judge Anita Brody, from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, ordered Layn Phillips, a retired judge, to serve as mediator in the case.
Judge Brody said she would not rule on the N.F.L.'s motion to dismiss the case until Sept. 3 to give the mediator time to bring the sides closer. She had expected to rule on that motion July 22. The judge said she had an “informal exploratory telephone conference with lead counsel” Monday before referring the case to a mediator.
The league and the lawyers representing more than 4,000 players and their wives will now meet in a conference room instead of a courtroom to try to iron out their differences, which will not be easy given the complexity of the case."

'via Blog this'

New Law Proposed to Study Burn Pit Toxic Exposures

The “Helping Veterans Exposed to Toxic Chemicals Act” (H.R. 2510) has been offered in Congress to create Centers of Excellence to care for service members exposed to burn pits, the open air fires sued to dispose of waste in the war zones of Iraq and Afghanistan.  Actions have been brought against KBR and Halliburton - military contractors who operated burn pits.  - 
GWC  
New Law Proposed to Study Burn Pit Toxic Exposures:

Congressman Tim Bishop (D-NY) and Congresswoman Diana DeGette (D-CO) were joined by representatives from veteran advocacy groups, physicians, and family members of veterans today to announce new bipartisan legislation to address the health crisis among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans who were exposed to open-air burn pits and other airborne hazards during their service overseas. Original cosponsors of the legislation also include Congressmen Walter Jones (R-NC) and Jim Cooper (D-TN)....

'via Blog this'

OTHERWISE: Another preemption loss in the Supreme Court for consumers injured by generic drugs (CL&P Blog)

OTHERWISE: Another preemption loss in the Supreme Court for consumers injured by generic drugs (CL&P Blog):



'via Blog this'

Let Shooting Victims Sue - NYTimes.com

Getty image

Let Shooting Victims Sue - NYTimes.com:
by Robert M. Morgenthau  (Manhattan District Attorney 1975 - 2009)

Decades ago, the tobacco industry hired doctors to plug the health benefits of cigarettes, and the auto industry claimed that seat belts were an unnecessary extravagance. The results were an epidemic of deaths, followed by civil law suits, followed by industry reform.

Today, smoking is down and cars are safer. In part, we have the market to thank. When these industries acted irresponsibly, basic principles of civil liability placed the costs of illness and accident where they belonged. Once their bottom line was affected, even the most myopic executives had to take notice.

I believe that with rights come responsibilities. By immunizing the gun industry from basic principles of legal liability, Congress kept the rights and repealed the responsibilities.

The Second Amendment right to bear arms is an important right. But the contours of that right must not extend to those who look away as their guns enter the hands of criminals and the mentally unstable. Congress should immediately repeal the 2005 gun immunity law, and let free-market incentives encourage responsible behavior by the gun industry.

'via Blog this'

The Obligatory Nutshell Version of Veterans Benefits - The Faculty Lounge:

The Faculty Lounge: The Obligatory Nutshell Version of Veterans Benefits:
by Jasmes Ridgway
There are three elements that determine whether disability benefits are granted:  (1) current disability, (2) in-service disease or injury, and (3) nexus.  These elements are similar — but not the same as — the issues in many tort claims:  (1) injury, (2) violation of a duty by the defendant, and (3) proximate cause.  However, there is no issue of duty.  The veteran is simply trying to prove that his or her current problem is related to something that happened while he or she was in service.  Many veterans misunderstand and think that all their disabilities are subject to compensation regardless of whether they are “service connected,” but this is not the case.  (“Service connection” is a term of art, and it is incredibly common to hear claims for disability compensation referred to as claims for “service connection” for a condition.)



'via Blog this'

TortsProf Blog: Catastrophic Payments and Medical Malpractice

TortsProf Blog: Catastrophic Payments and Medical Malpractice:

by Christopher J. Robinette, Widener Law School

Terry Baynes of Reuters has written an article about the recent study by a group of physicians at John Hopkins finding that large med mal awards do not contribute significantly to healthcare costs. The article quotes the lead author of the study, Dr. Marty Makary, and me on the issue. My comments appear somewhat more skeptical of the med mal tort system than I actually am (through no fault of Ms. Baynes), and that caused me to reflect further on the significance of the study. 
The study (pdf) finds that catastrophic judgments (of over $1M) constitute approximately .05% of national healthcare costs (as measured in 2010). I believe the inferences and recommendations that Dr. Makary and his colleagues draw from this are generally correct. First, they determine that catastrophic payouts are not a major driver of health care costs. Second, at least in interviews, Dr. Makary argues that defensive medicine due to the vague standard of care is a bigger expense than catastrophic payouts. Third, acknowledging the study does not include costs of defensive medicine, the authors conclude that the financial savings due to malpractice reform may be minimal compared to other drivers of health care costs. Fourth, at least in interviews, Dr. Makary argues that malpractice reform should not be focused on caps, but on the standard of care.

'via Blog this'