Judge Carl Barbier, E.D. Louisiana |
In the Deepwater Horizon spill claimants had the benefit of the Oil Pollution Act (1990) which - Barbier had advised the parties - did not contain the maritime law's restrictions dating back to Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Flint, 275 U.S. 303 (1927). There Justice Holmes announced the rule that only those who suffered property damage or personal injury could make a claim for economic loss. Until BP only fishermen had been spared that stricture. The settlement vindicates the Testbank dissent by civil rights movement hero Judge John Minor Wisdom who argued that all engaged in "primary maritime activity" should be compensated including seafood processors, chandlers, tackle shops, fuel docks, and shoreline companies etc. The DeepWater Horizon settlement actually exceeds Wisdom's suggested scope. - gwc
This progress was achieved without banning automobiles, swimming pools, or matches. Instead, it came from translating writing essay findings into effective interventions.
ReplyDeletethe Allies bombed the In german town of Dresden, eliminating roughly 35,000 citizens. breast pills
ReplyDelete