Pages
(Move to ...)
Remedies - Syllabus - Fall 2024
Remedies - Policies- Fall 2024
Home
Syllabus Remedies Spring 2024
Policies - Remedies Spring 2024
Slavery, natural law, and positive law
Remedies - Policies - Fall 2023
Syllabus - Remedies - Fall 2023
Syllabus - Remedies - Fall 2022
Judging and the Judicial Process
Administrative Procedure Act - Judicial Review
Syllabus Remedies Spring 2023
Policies - Remedies Spring 2023
Syllabus Remedies 2022 spring term
Remedies - POLICIES SPRING 2022
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump
Pandemic remedies
Injunctions
Integration of public schools- Separate and Unequal
School Funding
Domestic Violence
Restatement of the Law 3rd Torts: Liability for Economic Harm
BP Deepwater Horizon Spill
Remedies Syllabus Spring 2022
Voting Rights
DePuy ASR Hip Implant Litigation
People's Electric - Engaged legal Education at Rut...
Securities Fraud
Remedies Syllabus - Fall 2020
Remedies - Syllabus - Spring 2021
Online teaching
Judges and Judicial Appointments
Uber
Fulton and Catholic Social Services v. Philadelphia
Students for Fair Admissions - Affirmative action Challenges
Abortion - after Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health
Reconciliation and Reparations
Students for Fair Admissions - Affirmative action Challenges
Syllabus - Remedies - Fall 2023
Remedies - Policies - Fall 2023
Policies - Remedies Spring 2023
Administrative Procedure Act - Judicial Review
Slavery, natural law, and positive law
Injunctions
Abortion - after Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health
Reconciliation and Reparations
Syllabus - Remedies - Fall 2023
Remedies - Policies - Fall 2023
Abortion - after Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health
Reconciliation and Reparations
Slavery, natural law, and positive law
Administrative Procedure Act - Judicial Review
Modernizing regulatory review - Memorandum from the President
Students for Fair Admissions - Affirmative action Challenges
Judges and Judicial Appointments
Integration of public schools- Separate and Unequal
Online teaching
Judging and the Judicial Process
Injunctions
School Funding
Gay rights and Marriage Equality
Restatement of the Law 3rd Torts: Liability for Economic Harm
People's Electric - Engaged legal Education at Rutgers newark in the '60s and '70s
Integration of public schools- Separate and Unequal
Administrative Procedure Act - Judicial Review
▼
OTHERWISE: Tobacco Research Center replies to ALI on industry influence
OTHERWISE: Tobacco Research Center replies to ALI on industry influence :
The Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education hassharply criticized the ALI's response to the Center's recent study . The Center revealed that fifty years ago tobacco industry lawyers secretly - and apparently successfully - lobbied American Law Institute Reporter William Prosser. His draft was modified to exempt "good tobacco" from the new strict liability rule in the ALI's landmark Section 402A the scripture of contemporary product liability law. The ALI responded with a cursory "we tell our members to leave their clients at the door". The Center responds:
"The ALI’s refusal to engage the issues we document is the most troubling aspect of their response. If the ALI’s goal is to create credible, independent assessments of law, it must implement the same conflict of interest policies that have become routine at other comparable organizations. The ALI responders’ out-of-hand dismissal of the unrefuted documentary evidence we present and the associated recommendations to correct serious flaws in the ALI’s conflict of interest policies belie their professed commitment to “consider legitimate criticism expressed in careful and responsible scholarship."
'via Blog this'
No comments:
Post a Comment