I haven't seen this movie starring Mark Lanier as himself. But, having been a drafter of the appeal brief in McDarby v. Merck, I can affirm that Mark Lanier is one hell of a trial lawyer.
Law.com - Attorney-Penned Movie Features Mark Lanier Playing Trial Lawyer
Friday, April 29, 2011
Thursday, April 28, 2011
Most Cardiologists earn over $300,000 - but think they are underpaid
Remember these numbers the next time you read about why we have to limit medical malpractice claims.
New York, NY - Cardiologists—especially males—are among some of the highest-paid physicians in the US, but most believe they are inadequately reimbursed for what they do.Those numbers come from a 2011 Physician Compensation Report, based on a survey of over 15 000 US physicians conducted earlier this year and compiled by Medscape [1].According to survey respondents, cardiologists were among the third-highest-paid physicians in 2010, after orthopedic surgeons and radiologists, with 60% of cardiologists reporting that they made more than $300 000 and 20% saying they earned more than $500 000. Those earnings include salary, bonus, and profit-sharing earnings, but not any non-patient-related earnings, such as payments from consulting/speaking engagements or expert-witness services.By comparison, pediatricians, the lowest paid, earned a median income of $148 000 in 2010, slightly lower than primary-care physicians, at $159 000.Female cardiologists earn markedly lower salaries, on average, than their male counterparts—a median of $249 000, compared with $340 000. The gender gap appears to be related to women prioritizing more flexible schedules over salaries, to "allow for more family time," the survey results say. Of note, 80% of physicians who responded to the survey were male.
Labels:
cardiologist,
Medical Malpractice reform,
salaries
At 9/11 Trial, Lawyers Will Watch the Clock - NYTimes.com
Judge Alvin Hellerstein has informed counsel that he will limit trial time to one month in the only wrongful death action against the airlines and others whose negligence is alleged to have facilitated the 9/11 catastrophe. 90 cases settled. Thousands accepted the compensation offered by the September 11 Victims Compensation Fund
According to the Times
At 9/11 Trial, Lawyers Will Watch the Clock - NYTimes.com
According to the Times
Donald A. Migliori, a lawyer for the Bavises, said limiting the trial to one month and dividing the time equally — he made the 50- to 60-hour estimate — was ambitious for a case of such magnitude, particularly for his client, the plaintiff, who bears the burden of proof. The lawsuit contends that the hijackers were able to board United Airlines Flight 175 in Boston because of negligence by United and other defendants, which include an airport security firm.
Monday, April 25, 2011
Data mining - targeting MD's for drug sales
In the Vioxx cases "targeting" of physicians was a big issue. The hard sell was on for a medication with little to commend it - and experience would prove - much to fear from it. The high-priced patented prescription medication competed principally with the generic naproxen - sold as Aleve. Merck's sales staff was armed with information from pharmacy benefit providers about what medicines the doctors prescribed.
Three states have limited the practice. The Supreme Court will soon hear the case - Sorrell v. IMS Health, Inc. I don't know that it is an invasion of privacy. But I do think it is part of a hard sell that presents risks that doctors will respond to the blandishments and the pressure, rather than the data about the drug's risks and effectiveness.
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
An Oyster on the Seder Plate? - NYTimes.com
by Paul Greenberg
LAST night I put an oyster on my Seder plate.
Jason Logan
Related
Times Topic: BP Plc.
While I didn’t particularly want to put something traif atop that most kosher of dishes, this Passover falls on the first anniversary of the Deepwater Horizon blowout in the Gulf of Mexico. And since BP, the leaseholder of the failed well, seems intent with its new television ads on making us forget about the spill, I felt that something drastic was in order to help us remember. Combining the memorial powers of the Seder plate with the canary-in-the-coal-mine nature of the oyster seemed a good way to keep the disaster — and BP’s promises to clean up its mess — in mind.
This past March I spent a week in Louisiana’s bays and bayous. All over the region I encountered oyster dredges full of dead, empty shells and broken oystermen with equally empty pockets. Many of the oystermen I interviewed reported that 80 percent of their beds had been killed.
Ecologically speaking, this is huge: a single oyster can filter 40 gallons of water a day, and the millions of oysters in Louisiana’s waters are one of the things that make the gulf work as an ecosystem.
Many on gulf Coast Frustrated by Claims Process - NY Times
Many Louisiana residents claim they did not sign up for the lawyer who, according to court records. is their lawyer.
Monday, April 18, 2011
Year After Deepwater Horizon Spill, a Perfect Day for Redfish - NYTimes.com
The commercial fishermen of the Gulf Coast face a tough choice. BP's settlement czar Kenneth Feinberg has offered them compensation of double their 2010 loss. He thinks the fish suffered little. Here we see a great day of fishing in the Bayou. What does it mean for the long term? Chris Santella reports from the Gulf:
Year After Deepwater Horizon Spill, a Perfect Day for Redfish - NYTimes.com
“I think that the reason fishing has been great is related to the spill. First, many of the species that make up the marine ecosystem here have had an entire spawning period to reproduce and grow without being harvested, thanks to commercial fishing moratoriums. That puts more bait in the water, which supports more and bigger fish.
“I also believe that redfish habitat in other parts of the Gulf of Mexico has been damaged, and that some of the displaced fish have come here. I have not personally seen any oil residue around these marshes, but I can’t say it’s not there. We just don’t know for sure. One thing that’s certain; the long-term effects of the spill have not played out.”
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Gulf’s Complexities Come Into Focus as Spill’s Damage Is Tallied - NYTimes.com
Leslie Kaufman reports for the Times:
Gulf’s Complexities Come Into Focus as Spill’s Damage Is Tallied - NYTimes.com
"There is no doubt that gulf water, wildlife and wetlands sustained injury when, beginning on April 20 last year, some 4.9 million barrels of oil and 1.84 million gallons of dispersants poured into the waters off Louisiana. But the ecosystem was not passive in the face of this assault. The gulf, which experiences a natural seepage of millions of gallons of oil a year, had the innate capacity to digest some of crude and the methane gas mixed with it. Almost as soon as the well was capped, the deep became cleaner to the eye. By the same token, dozens of miles of marsh still remain blackened by heavy oil, government crews are still grooming away tar balls that wash up ceaselessly on beaches and traces of the dispersants are still found floating in the currents....."
Saturday, April 2, 2011
Blowout: Legal Legacy of the Deepwater Horizon Catastrophe - Roger Williams University
Roger Williams University School of Law, Marine Affairs Institute is hosting
update - the complete program
update - the complete program
April 13, 2011
Bristol, Rhode Island
AGENDA
One of our nation's worst environmental and human disasters began on April 20, 2010, when the Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded, killing 11 people, injuring 17 others, and spilling millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. What is the state of the law one year later, as the human and environmental toll rises? This conference will convene national leaders, elected officials and legal experts to examine the law’s response to this calamity to date and consider the future legal legacy. We will consider issues of agency capture, tort liability, natural resource damages, and changes to law and regulation contemplated by Congress and the President's National Commission.
9:00 – 9:15 a.m. Welcome
Ronald O. Champagne, President, Roger Williams University
David A. Logan, Dean, Roger Williams University School of Law
Susan E. Farady, Director, Marine Affairs Institute, RWU School of Law
9:15 – 9:30 a.m. Keynote: Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) (video recorded)
9:30 –11:00 a.m. Panel I: Origin of a Disaster
Deepwater Horizon was sited in accordance with existing regulations and policies, yet the blowout and its aftermath demonstrated significant weaknesses in the current regulatory system. This panel will examine how this disaster unfolded, including the laws regarding offshore oil and gas, protection of the marine environment, the health and safety of maritime workers, and the role of regulators and industry.
Moderator: Michael Burger, Professor, RWU School of Law
Panelists:
Stephen Da Ponte, Atty., USCG Headquarters, Office of Maritime and International Law
Juliet Eilperin, Reporter, The Washington Post Garret Graves, Director, Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority, State of Louisiana
Sidney Shapiro, Associate Dean for Research and Development, Wake Forest University School of Law
David Westerholm, Director, Office of Response and Restoration, National Ocean Service, NOAA
11:00 – 11:15 a.m. Break
11:15 – 12:30 p.m. Panel II: Assessing Damage to Marine and Human Communities
The Gulf of Mexico ecosystem experienced significant harm as a result of the Deepwater disaster. This panel will discuss the challenges of assessing damage to ecosystems and the human communities that surround them following an environmental disaster.
Moderator: Susan Farady, RWU School of Law
Panelists: Hal Chittum, Chittum Skiffs
Kevin Dean, Esq., Motley Rice
James J. Opaluch, Professor & Dept. Chair, Environmental and Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island
Jill Rowe, Biologist, Applied Science Associates, Inc.
12:30 – 1:30 p.m. Lunch
Speaker: Christopher M. Reddy, Sr. Scientist, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute
1:30 – 2:45 p.m. Panel III: Sue or Settle? The Adequacy of Tort Law to Fairly and Expeditiously Compensate Victims of Mass Disasters
The Deepwater Horizon catastrophe caused extensive damages to businesses on the Gulf of Mexico and beyond. This panel will explore whether tort law is up to the task, either procedurally or doctrinally, to fairly compensate victims of mass disasters or whether a compensation fund is preferable.
Moderator: David A. Logan, RWU School of Law
Panelists:
George W. Conk, Adjunct Professor & Sr. Fellow, Stein Center, Fordham Law School
Deborah E. Greenspan, Atty., Dickstein Shapiro LLP
Donald A. Migliori, Esq., Motley Rice
2:45 – 3:00 p.m. Break
3:00 – 3:15 p.m. Keynote Speaker: Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) (video recorded)
3:15 – 4:45 p.m. Panel IV: The Legal Legacy
The wake of the Deepwater disaster included numerous legislative hearings, introduction of numerous pieces of legislation and high-level investigative Commissions. Will legislation significantly change law and policy in environmental, energy and tort arenas? What will the lasting legal legacy of the Deepwater Horizon be?
Moderator: Dennis Nixon, Associate Dean/Professor, University of Rhode Island
Panelists: Fred H. Bartlit, Jr., Esq., Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott
LLP, Chief Counsel to National Commission on BP Deepwater Horizon
Oil Spill
Thomas C. Galligan., Jr., President and Professor of Humanities, Colby- Sawyer College
David Pettit, Senior Attorney, Natural Resources Defense Council
Jonathan K. Waldron, Esq., Blank Rome LLP
5:00 – 6:00 p.m. Reception Linden Place, Bristol, RI
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)